Marketing industry trade body’s Director of Insight, Ian Gibbs, provides CMOs and marketers with key takeaways from its best practice guidance to prove marketing effectiveness in the boardroom
The current economic climate of stagflation has meant that marketing budgets are under more pressure than ever. Depressed economic growth has seen consumers tighten their belts, while cost inflation has eaten into company profits, and, in turn, put pressure on marketing budgets from savings-hungry Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) looking for efficiencies.
There is now a greater burden on the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) to prove the impact of their spend, with an ever-increasing demand to articulate short-term business outcomes at the expense of focusing on what drives long-term sustainable business growth.
At the same time, short-term performance marketing effectiveness has declined by 62% over the past two years, with it becoming harder to stimulate an immediate response from cash-strapped consumers.
The knock-on effect has been that marketing effectiveness is below pre-pandemic levels for the second year running, according to the Data & Marketing Association’s (DMA UK) Effectiveness Databank.
It’s all too easy to blame the external macro-environment without considering what the cause of this effeciveness decline might be a little closer to home. One key contributing factor is sub-standard measurement practices.
If we are not measuring the right marketing outcomes, then how can we hope to arrest this decline in effectiveness by optimising future marketing spend?
The DMA is calling on marketers to prioritise implementing effective measurement to combat the industry’s worsening measurement crisis. Identifying and communicating marketing effectiveness have become complex tasks, but they don’t need to be.
Total Number of Effects (Business, Brand and Response Effects)
BEST PRACTICE GUIDANCE WITH 5 KEY TAKEAWAYS
The measurement crisis has been discussed by the DMA for a few years now but marketers continue to do themselves an injustice by not changing their approach. We must prioritise implementing effective measurement to combat the industry’s worsening measurement crisis.
Our new CMO Measurement Toolkit is designed to help by providing CMOs and marketers with the guidance they need to identify effective measurement and prove marketing effectiveness in the boardroom to showcase the true value of marketing. It draws on insight from the DMA’s Effectiveness Databank: a database of advertising effectiveness which has now been updated to cover over 1,200 DMA award entries from the last six years.
We want to help the industry communicate marketing effectiveness in the boardroom, while focusing on the measurement best practices that truly articulate our fantastic work as robustly as possible.
Marketers can work towards this by adopting the following guidance:
Average Number of Business, Brand, and Response Effects per Campaign
Time to stop overcomplicating marketing
The challenge and, to some extent, confusion that is present in the industry is highlighted by the fact that there are nearly 180 different metrics being monitored and measured by marketers, according to our Effectiveness Databank.
CMOs must identify the ‘metrics that matter’ and take on board this guidance as to how their marketers can shift from shallow campaign metrics towards the ultimate goal of business metrics.
Our toolkit not only provides marketers with actionable insights, but it also offers a checklist of our key guidance, to help them summarise their current maturity and rapidly identify opportunities for progression in the measurement space.
Only when CMOs and marketers can communicate the value of their metrics and how they support business outcomes, can they truly start to speak the language of the boardroom.